15 Comments

David Martin is a Freemason that cannot be trusted. He exists to make people think that Covid is real.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this. I understand the importance of challenging and hopefully getting rid of the virus dogma as you so aptly called it in a recent podcast, but the attacks on people who are doing good work to challenge other aspects of the covid crime for not completely shedding their belief in viruses is becoming screechy and self-defeating. You allude to deep state forces which I don't doubt propagate some of this but unfortunately it's also to be heard in some who have been at the forefront of challenging the existence of viruses. I was particularly troubled by Tom Cowan's recent attack on various speakers at the European Parliament - some of whom have done good work - without acknowledging what a landmark that conference represented, to have doubts about the covid charade voiced in that place.

I'm thinking especially of his attack on David Martin's presentation which was misconstrued to be about science when in fact what he highlights is the evidence of malintent going back decades on the part of individuals and institutions controlling 'the science'. Something where the existence or otherwise of viruses, the validity or otherwise of genetic models etc is beside the point. To hold him up to ridicule because he quoted a patent without commenting on the reality or otherwise of what was patented (when Martin always says the "alleged virus" and "alleged pandemic") was again to my mind self-defeating, especially since Martin is attacking the people directly responsible for this catastrophic crime.

I understand Cowan's frustration, but diatribes like that just encourage the no virus trolls out there - many without necessarily bad intent themselves - to harass and undermine people who focus the many other strands of this attack on humanity.

Expand full comment

Only truth can unite and will set us free.

So 'camp keeping the virus illusion alive' will have to see and speak truth for what it is before they can be taken seriously as it is really simple: no proof for any disease being contagious means no proof for any pathogenic virus either.

Not clearly speaking the virus truth was a mistake in the AIDS truth movement.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this post.

Very informative.

In the line "Unsupported by the above named scientists, various agencies spouting anger are now acting to" the word "agencies" seems to have an incomplete link. Maybe no link was meant to go there?

Expand full comment